Is ‘Drill Baby, Drill’ the Equivalent of ‘Kill Baby, Kill’?

A very interesting read appeared yesterday on CBS News’ website pointing out that many of the recent conflicts around the world, whether it is actual war or just a war of words, have one element in common: energy resources are a big factor in all.  This is an observation that is certainly uncontroversial and most people on both sides of the political spectrum in the United States should be able to easily see the reality of this fact.

These conflicts are obviously over non-renewable, limited energy resources that most countries need going forward to keep their lights on and their societies moving.  But looking at overall energy generation the countries listed in the article have something else in common.  They are mostly at or near the bottom of the list when it comes to percentage of their total renewable energy generation.

This is not to make the argument the countries at the top of this list are peaceful utopias where everyone is happy and the streets are paved with gold and everyone is working toward the next most important and logical step in the betterment of mankind: moon colonies.  But certainly a case could be made that an increase in renewable energy in every country could logically reduce the reasons for conflict, whether armed or not, between countries.

However, there is also a side story to this debate and that is conservation.  This is an idea that is, in some circles in the U.S., the equivalent of blasphemy.  The belief is we should not have to conserve at any time because we are free and conserving is a restriction that can be controversial to say the least.  One of the ideas that would probably rile many in America I remember first seeing in Bill Maher’s comedy book “When You Ride Alone You Ride with Bin Laden.”  The idea was not putting up Christmas lights as part of your decorations in the interest of not funding terrorism through using energy that is supplied by countries linked to terrorism.

Ignoring the debate about a war on Christmas or religion and focusing solely on energy consumption, this brings up an interesting thought experiment.  What if making sure we aren’t using energy for non-essential purposes would translate into lives saved?

To clarify something before moving on, everyone’s definition of ‘non-essential purposes’ will vary from person to person.  An environmentalist’s definition will likely look vastly different from a libertarian’s.  For the purposes of this post, let’s just stick with Christmas lights as the example and everyone is free to expand the definition to their own liking.

What if not using lights in your decorations (or using solar powered lights only) could be quantitatively shown to save, for example, an American soldier’s life in the long-run by reducing the need for conflict over energy resources in the future?  Would people get behind the idea?  I think it’s safe to say, most probably would and it would give a whole new meaning to the idea of supporting the troops.  Now expand the definition and the possible effects of conservation if applied to other areas of your life like adjusting the thermostat a bit or adjusting food consumption in our obese country which would reduce energy consumption through less creation and transport of food.  You see how this can quickly add up even though it would be an effort made on the individual level.

I know some might argue these lights are a type of art form and they are expressing themselves through this and this is the equivalent of cutting funding for the arts by the government.  I have a news flash for you.  Putting an outline of a snowman on your roof does not equate to Mark Twain writing a novel or Da Vinci painting an image.  If we want to insult their legacies, let’s put it this way.  They did what they did to show off and make money.  You are just showing off (and consuming limited resources).  It is not the same thing so get over yourselves.

In politics questions sometimes get asked simply to score political points because the answer forces people to be one-sided and come to the side of the person posing the question.  For instance, asking whether the world is better off without Saddam Hussein to sway people to support the Iraq war debacle.  These questions are designed to simplify the argument and avoid taking all aspects of the debate into account, such as the cost of a program, the reason for its implementation, or the long term effects of it.  These questions make people like me pull our hair out because there is always more to the story than just one aspect and if other factors are ignored in the interest of scoring a political point bad things happen.  But for the sake of this post, I’m going to ask one.

Imagine that you knew a soldier who had died in a recent war (obviously not something that needs to be imagined for many) and you are visited by a higher power.  This higher power gives you a choice.  You can continue the way your life is going now or you can have that soldier back with certain conditions, such as never putting up Christmas lights again or being forced to drive a smaller car that gets better gas mileage for the rest of your life.  What choice would you make?

Given the fact we know international conflict is growing because of energy resources, this isn’t as imagined a scenario as we would like to think.  And since we know ‘drill baby, drill’ is only a temporary solution at best, doesn’t it really equate to ‘kill baby, kill’ in the long-run?

Questions about Supporting the Troops in Light of Tragedy

 

I awoke this morning to find this article at the top of the front page of Louisville’s Courier-Journal paper:

A Louisville Marine was killed Saturday while supporting combat in Afghanistan’s Helmand province, the Defense Department has reported.

Cpl. Aaron M. Faust, 22, was assigned to 2nd Battalion, 9th Marines, out of Camp Lejeune, N.C.. His death is under investigation.

Faust’s family declined to be interviewed, instead issuing a statement: “We appreciate the concern from our neighbors. As you must understand, our family is still in shock, and we are grieving the loss of our son and brother. It comforts us to know that we have the support of our community, citizens and country that Aaron died to protect.”

Faust graduated in 2007 from DeSales High School, said Doug Strothman, president of the school.

Strothman said he didn’t know Faust well. But Strothman said teachers who knew Faust described a young man who “didn’t mind testing the waters of authority, but he would do it in a respectful way.”

In his senior year after a Christian Awakening Retreat, Faust began to exhibit heightened maturity, Strothman said.

That maturation furthered a few years after Faust graduated — Faust showed up at the school in his Marine Corps uniform, looking like a “significantly different” person, Strothman said.

“He’d really grown to be an impressive young man,” Strothman said.

Faust’s mother, Tess, is employed in the media and public relations department of the Kentucky State Fair Board, according to a separate family statement sent by fair board spokeswoman Amanda Storment.

I went to DeSales High School like Cpl. Faust graduating ten years before.

This news has caused much tumult within me today. It has me asking many questions that are very unpopular but but I feel need answering:

1)      Is supporting the troops mean that we also have to support the war?

2)      What about the fact that members of the armed forces have volunteered to be cogs in the U.S.’s imperialistic war machine?

3)      How should we parse out today’s volunteer army compared conscripts who fought in other wars?

4)      What should I think about Cpl. Faust when he was shooting people who are rightfully fighting against foreign invaders?

5)      What role do soldiers play when they are the tentacles that are on the ground involved in the, though accidental, killing of innocent civilians?

6)      What about Abu-Ghraib, urinating on dead Taliban fighters and mutilating bodies?

7)      What about the fact that many armed forces members come from lower to lower-middle class backgrounds and they join the military as their only choice to find employment or for funding with which to use to attend college?

8)      When people say that the armed forces are protecting our freedom, who are they protecting it from?

9)      Despite the fact that I am 100% against the war in Afghanistan, should I still attend a memorial service for Cpl. Faust if one is held at DeSales High School?